PDA

View Full Version : Do you believe in these Jesus documentaries?


sweetscrazy
09-25-2007, 03:46 PM
My friend posted this in another forum, so cut and paste..

Documentary 1 Tomb of Jesus (http://youtube.com/watch?v=KHBQz6GWJAI) proposes that Jesus had a son with Mary Magdalene

Documentary 2 Jesus in Kashmir (http://youtube.com/watch?v=9DXCZFRsyl8) proposes Jesus didn't die on the cross nor did he ascend to Heaven but instead went to Kashmir after his crucifixion


Jesus survives the crucifixion

The Gospels affirm that Jesus was alive again and, the church adds, in a glorified state. Thomas was able to touch his wounds. Jesus is believed to have hung on the cross for six hours and presumed dead. So they didn't break his legs to speed up death. His body was brought down and Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus collected the body, wrapping it with some 75 pounds of a mixture of myrrh and aloes in strips of linen. Aloes is not an embalming but a healing herb. So it seems Jesus was resuscitated rather rose form the dead.

But a condemned man could not be seen in public - he was a wanted man. The Gospels deal with the problem by the device of the Ascension - this appears in the same last chapter 16 of Mark added 200 years after the original version. The Ascension is briefly mentioned in Luke - the last chapter (24:51): 'While he was blessing them, he left them and was taken up into heaven'. It is believed to be a later insertion from the Acts chapter 9 (Luke was also the author of the Acts).

There is no Ascension in Matthew while John concludes the last verse (25) in his last chapter (21) with: 'Jesus did many other things as well. If every one of them were written down, even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written.'


Jesus in the age period 14-29

What are these many things that have not been recorded? One record that is glaringly missing is the period 14-29 years in the life of Jesus. One theory is that he went to India to be trained as a Buddhist.

The story of the Wise Men is surprisingly similar to the traditions of Buddhism, a religion 500 years older than Christianity. When a great Buddhist holy man (lama) died, wise men consult the stars and go on a long trek to find his incarnation. When he is found, he is taken from his parents when old enough and trained in the Buddhist faith. Could Jesus have been identified as an incarnation and taken to India?

The Russian explorer, Nicolai Natovich travelled to northern India in the 19th century and found a manuscript in a Tibetan monastery which he translated as 'The Unknown Life of Jesus Christ'. It tells of a divine child called Issa born to a poor family in Israel. he learnt the teachings of Buddhism before returning to Israel at 29. The later teachings and miracles of Jesus have an uncanny parallel with the Buddhist counterpart. For example, the injunction to love your enemies and the promise that the meek will inherit the earth have no precedent in Judaism but they are found in Buddhism.

Examples:

1. Mark 6:48: he went out to them walking on the lake.

Anguttara Nikaya 3:60: He walks upon the water without parting it, as if it were solid ground.

2. Mark 10:25: it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter thekingdom of heaven.

Jatakamala 5:5 & 15: Riches make a man greedy and so are like a caravan lurching down the road to hell.

3. Matthew 6:20: Lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven where moth and rust do not destroy and where thieves do not break in and steal.

Kuddakaptha 8:9 Let the wise man do righteousness; a treasure that others cannot share, which no thief can steal, a treasure which does not pass away.

Jesus after the crucifixion

One story is that Jesus went to live with Mary Magdalene (together with her sister Martha and brother Lazarus) in France but this is unlikely as France was a Roman colony and he risked being spotted and arrested.

More likely, Jesus escaped to another country. The Jews are the tribe of Judah and according to the Hebrew Bible, there were 10 others that were banished by the Assyrians to the North East. One theory is that Jesus might have wanted to introduce himself to the the other tribes. It was easy to travel to the East either via the Silk route or the Spice route. Thomas the disciple followed the Spice route and landed in South India where he established a church.

In Kashmir, there is a tribe calling themselves Ben-i Israel; they claim to be descendants of the lost tribes. There is a story that in the first century a man from Israel called Issa (known locally as Yus Assaf meaning healer or Shepherd) returned to Kashmir. In a local temple called the Temple of Solomon, there used to be an inscription that told of Yus Assaf's claim in 50 AD to be Jesus.

Abdullah Assiz Kashmiri of the University of Srinagar says according to Kashmiri history books, Yus Assaf came from Israel; he claimed to be a prophet and messenger and spread his teachings. He continued to teach until he died around the year 80 AD. There is a modest building that claims to house his tomb. The first shrine was erected at the site around 112 AD and is now a shared gravesite shared with a Muslim holy man, Syed Nazir-ud-din, buried there in the 15th century.

Unless Issa's body is exhumed, we can't be sure that the body is a man who survived the crucifixion. However, next to the sarcophagus are the carved footprints that have marks or scars on them. Kashmiri said: "'The footprints were carved as a sign - the scars are clearly visible, as if he was nailed to the cross.. this must be the same person who came here from Israel... You won't find any footprints like these in Kashmir."

The position of the scars just behind the toes don't match each other but they would align if a single nail was driven through both feet with the left foot placed on the right.

If this is indeed the tomb of Jesus, then he spent most of his life in the kingdom of Kashmir. That means he did not died on the cross, there was no resurrection and he did not ascend into into heaven.

KikoyBalayon
09-25-2007, 03:56 PM
nope.. i like watching it though.. with popcorn and rum... :D to beat those lazy weekends.. :D

infinite_trial
09-25-2007, 04:20 PM
di ko pa mapanood yung video hehe nasa office pa ko. pero iba ba to dun sa jesus' secret family (http://www.timog.com/forum/showthread.php?t=913 3)?

pwede kasing totoo nga na meron silang nakitang evidence na merong 'jesus' na may asawa na 'mary magdalene' pero ang sabi sa ibang documentaries, common daw ang name na to so jesus could be one of them...or the jesus that was mentioned in the bible didn't exist at all. pero eto 100% na pinaniniwalaan ko, di na sya babalik :D

kakkoii_daw
09-25-2007, 04:42 PM
nope.. i like watching it though.. with popcorn and rum... :D to beat those lazy weekends.. :D

makabili na rin ng rum at mapanood yan memya. :D

sarpon
09-25-2007, 04:47 PM
makabili na rin ng rum at mapanood yan memya. :D

weekend pa ang raw ang rum sabi ni kikoy..:D

basta ako i still believe about resurrection, ascension and everything that is written in the bible.. yun lang po

kakkoii_daw
09-25-2007, 06:01 PM
weekend pa ang raw ang rum sabi ni kikoy..:D

basta ako i still believe about resurrection, ascension and everything that is written in the bible.. yun lang po

cant wait for the rum. ocha lang at aquarius ang laman ng vendo machine dito e. :D

la_tina512
09-25-2007, 06:11 PM
pero eto 100% na pinaniniwalaan ko, di na sya babalik :D

Papano kung bumalik Siya para sunduin lahat ng nananampalataya sa Kaniya? What if????? Grabe ang consequence noon.

infinite_trial
09-25-2007, 06:25 PM
Papano kung bumalik Siya para sunduin lahat ng nananampalataya sa Kaniya? What if????? Grabe ang consequence noon.
pano ko naman malalaman kung sya nga iyon? di ba sabi nga marami daw magpapanggap na sya si hesus?

sweetscrazy
09-25-2007, 06:36 PM
di ko pa mapanood yung video hehe nasa office pa ko. pero iba ba to dun sa jesus' secret family (http://www.timog.com/forum/showthread.php?t=913 3)?

pero eto 100% na pinaniniwalaan ko, di na sya babalik :D

'video can longer be found'

ako din naniniwala na hindi na babalik si Jesus. Ang ibig sabihin ni Jesus about his 2nd coming (according to Yogananada) ay ang 2nd coming ng Christ Consciousness at hindi ang physical coming nya.

Papano kung bumalik Siya para sunduin lahat ng nananampalataya sa Kaniya? What if????? Grabe ang consequence noon.

FYI, meron ding "future coming to save the world" ang ibang Buddhists at ito ay ang coming ni Maitreya Buddha. Sa tingin ko, pareho lang ang 2nd coming ng Christ Consciousness at ang coming ng maitreya Buddha (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maitreya). Pareho silang dadating pag maraming problema at calamities sa mundo. Dahil sa global warming and pole-shift (dumadami ang earthquakes), i think pwede itong mangyari this centruy

KikoyBalayon
09-26-2007, 07:39 AM
global warming(caused by us), pole shifts, earthquakes, tsunamis, blah blah blah. are event triggered by the evolution of our earth itself..

lets the scholars do their thing, lets watch them beat their brains out trying to prove us that a century old religion has its flaws, what religion hasnt got one?

whats important is that by believing in that person up there, we do good and feel good and watch those stupid documentaries trying to confuse us more.. i think ill have more rum.. :D

gabriel
09-26-2007, 09:43 AM
global warming(caused by us), pole shifts, earthquakes, tsunamis, blah blah blah. are event triggered by the evolution of our earth itself..

lets the scholars do their thing, lets watch them beat their brains out trying to prove us that a century old religion has its flaws, what religion hasnt got one?

whats important is that by believing in that person up there, we do good and feel good and watch those stupid documentaries trying to confuse us more.. i think ill have more rum.. :D

Buti pa nga KIKS! RUM pa nga diyan gusto ko na ring ma lashing!:p

infinite_trial
09-26-2007, 11:17 AM
hindi ko napanood kagabi, bagsak ako sa rum :D

sarpon
09-26-2007, 03:25 PM
di ko maintindihan ang ibang religion.. bakit kailangan nilang pabulaanan ang mga doctrines ng kabilang religion? di ba sapat na magturo na lang sila kung ano yung belief nila? di kaya kasi kailangan nilang mangalap ng mga bagong miyembro galing sa ibang religion?

nagtatanong lang po...:D

kakkoii_daw
09-26-2007, 03:50 PM
di ko maintindihan ang ibang religion.. bakit kailangan nilang pabulaanan ang mga doctrines ng kabilang religion? di ba sapat na magturo na lang sila kung ano yung belief nila? di kaya kasi kailangan nilang mangalap ng mga bagong miyembro galing sa ibang religion?

nagtatanong lang po...:D

hmmm.. u mean business strategy? :D

KikoyBalayon
09-26-2007, 08:39 PM
cappy.. not exactly business.. kasi naman most catholics dont even pay up enough money for the church to survive.. its more like market share... diba? rum nga...

naughtymeeh
09-26-2007, 09:08 PM
I confess i was a blinded Catholic believer when i was in H.S,i was even part of the founding members of a religious organization in school (i actually squimm in disbelief now)I wasn`t self rightous or anything like that ( i hopea) '&still get along with heaps of people,regardless of their religion or belief.
Ironically,when i went to DLSU,w/c i s known as aCatholis University in P.I.I got introduced to several professors who presented different ways of thinking.I meet different people who were very outspoken about their beliefs.My professor in Contemporary Philosophywas an "Out an Out of the Closet" ATHEIST,my other professor was an EXISTENTIALIST,and a classmate of mine was an AGNOSTIC.I have never encounterd succ diversity.Being a person with an open mind,i listened and saw the validity of their arguments.I found myself leaning towards EXISTENTIALISM diving my first year in UNIV.That is until i had Mr Monera for a religious class.It was a bible exegis class,w/c involves an existensive and critical interpretation of a text.In this case we were made to pick certain books of the bible and conduct research to determine history,tradition and authorship of the books.Wow,so GOD didn`t write the bible after all.Fantastic stuff,isn`t it?Turns out that the bible was a collection of stories written by men>These stories went to a lot of heavy editing at the First Council of NICAEA during the time of Emperor Constantine in 325AD.During this time,a lot of books,now known as the GNOSTIC GOSPELS,were removed.Basically,th e council developed wht we know of CHRISTIANITY now.The divinity of JESUS CHRIST-MAN,but not man like-Son of God who knew no women,who couldn`t possibly have any sort of relationship let alone a family.
FROM existentialist,I have become Agnostic.I began to read books that would question the validity of religion and existence of GOD.I have been Agnostic for many years now and people say that it`s natural progression would be turning to an ANTEIST.I may be a few steps from that now since the September 11 happened. I am not sying that religion doesn`t do anything good with people.Sure,there are people who trulyfeel like their lives have improved because of it,and best luck to them.What i gripe about are those who feel like they are better than everyone because of their faith and thus do evil things in the name of their god.As Steven Weinberg,the 1979 Nobel Peace Price winner in Physics,said"Religion is an insult to human dignity,without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things.But for good people to do evil thing,that takes religion."The ideal of greater GOD is fantastic.Very Ideal.But,if you take the scriptures literally,what you have is a racist,petty,jealous ,unjust and unforgiving god.Why would we want to emulate someone like that?Have a chat with fundamentalist christians and right wing muslims and you`ll see my frustrations>You can never have a logical arguments with those people.both are convinced that the other is believing a lie that they are the only ones going to heaven.WHAT EGO!
If you are open minded and secure in your own personal belief.Pls read "THe God delusion" by richard Dawkins.It has been on my bedside for the past few days but it`s not the best bed time book.It`s guaranteed to keep you awake and think.Also watch the ff documentaries
1.THE TRUTH OFF ALL EVIL--------by:RICHARD DAWKINS
2.GOD ON MY SIDE-------------------by:ANDREW DENTON

kakkoii_daw
09-27-2007, 08:57 AM
@kiks,
im not saying catholics, dyan ko din naman first time natikman ang rum, este mompo pala. :D

@naughtymeeh,
napanood ko na yang documentaries ni richard dawkins. tsaka ung 'the enemies of reason'. :D

sweetscrazy
09-27-2007, 01:55 PM
di ko maintindihan ang ibang religion.. bakit kailangan nilang pabulaanan ang mga doctrines ng kabilang religion? di ba sapat na magturo na lang sila kung ano yung belief nila? di kaya kasi kailangan nilang mangalap ng mga bagong miyembro galing sa ibang religion?

nagtatanong lang po...:D

sa tingin ko, kelangan pabulaanan ang mga doktrina ng ibang relihiyon kapag nagiging fundamentalist ang mga miyembro nito. Silly doctrines and dogmas cause conflict between religions, like Sunnis vs Shiites and Muslims vs Christians, because they think their belief is superior to others.

Christians (like the Muslims) think that only they will be saved. Just watch
Jesus camp (http://youtube.com/watch?v=8bB2rt3IKJc) or go to a born-again gathering. This phenomenon is common in Semitic religions (those which come from Abraham like Judaism, Christianity, Islam)

If you go to other religions, you'll see that they all have the same essence therefore, every religion is the same and no one should be fundamentalist